-i and -c <code>? #994

Activity

1. sebastinas commented on Jul 12, 2023

   

   sebastinas

   on Jul 12, 2023

   Contributor

   More actions

   The behavior is consistent with running those commands with python3. Do you see a difference?
2. fferri commented on Jul 12, 2023

   

   fferri

   on Jul 12, 2023

   Author

   More actions

   Well, python3 never prints the banner when using -c.

   Also, python3 doesn't uses ncurses, so a comparison is not really possible.

   Since bpython uses ncurses, it should do so in all interactive cases, including bpython -i -c 'from mymodule import *', no?
3. sebastinas commented on Jul 12, 2023

   

   sebastinas

   on Jul 12, 2023

   Contributor

   More actions

   Well, python3 never prints the banner when using -c.

   In which case does bpython print a banner when using -c?

   Also, python3 doesn't uses ncurses, so a comparison is not really possible.

   The goal is that the common command line options behave the same. If they don't, that's a bug. If they are consistent with python3, it's not.
4. fferri commented on Jul 12, 2023

   

   fferri

   on Jul 12, 2023

   Last edited by fferri

   Author

   More actions

   The goal is that the common command line options behave the same. If they don't, that's a bug. If they are consistent with python3, it's not.

   Then perhaps a new command line switch (which injects an initial command into the interactive session) would be best.

   For the record: both bpython -i file.py and setting PYTHONSTARTUP=/path/to/file.py would work, but for a short simple oneliner, having to create a file is not that convenient. That probably is also the reason of having a -c command line switch in python, although that could be intended for different usecases than interactive sessions.
5. sebastinas

   added

   enhancement

   on Jul 13, 2023
6. thomasballinger commented on Aug 1, 2023

   

   thomasballinger

   on Aug 1, 2023

   Last edited by thomasballinger

   Member

   More actions

   A similar option exists called --paste that reads from a file. I see, you'd like this from the command line.
7. fferri commented on Aug 2, 2023

   

   fferri

   on Aug 2, 2023

   Last edited by fferri

   Author

   More actions

   --paste pastes from file. In this scenario it doesn't add anything to -i (see above).

   Pasting from a string would make sense.

   If I have gone thru the effort of putting my from mymodule import * line into a file, then also bpython -i file.py would work, as I already said above; or the same work can be off-loaded to the shell (YMMV), e.g. with zsh, there are two ways.

   1. process substitution, but bpython won't work with a fd:

   ❯ bpython -p <(echo 'from mymodule import *')
   bpython version 0.24 on top of Python 3.11.4 /opt/homebrew/opt/[email protected]/bin/python3.11
   
   Traceback (most recent call last):
     File "/opt/homebrew/bin/bpython", line 8, in <module>
       sys.exit(main())
                ^^^^^^
     File "/opt/homebrew/lib/python3.11/site-packages/bpython/curtsies.py", line 248, in main
       repl.mainloop(True, paste)
     File "/opt/homebrew/lib/python3.11/site-packages/bpython/curtsies.py", line 170, in mainloop
       self.process_event(paste)
     File "/opt/homebrew/lib/python3.11/site-packages/bpython/curtsiesfrontend/repl.py", line 656, in process_event
       return self.process_control_event(e)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     File "/opt/homebrew/lib/python3.11/site-packages/bpython/curtsiesfrontend/repl.py", line 681, in process_control_event
       ctrl_char = compress_paste_event(e)
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     File "/opt/homebrew/lib/python3.11/site-packages/bpython/curtsiesfrontend/repl.py", line 2228, in compress_paste_event
       event = paste_event.events[0]
               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^
   IndexError: list index out of range
   

   2. temp file substitution:

   ❯ bpython -p =(echo 'from mymodule import *')
   bpython version 0.24 on top of Python 3.11.4 /opt/homebrew/opt/[email protected]/bin/python3.11
   >>> from mymodule import *
   >>>
   

   The second form works, but it creates a temp file, so I somewhat still dislike that (I think as a temp file as the very last resort workaround, the apotheosis of failed integration between two programs).

   Reading from a fd (named pipe) <(echo 'from mymodule import *') would be slightly better, but the best I think is supporting also an actual string to paste.

   Also, --paste - would not work (in most command line programs, passing - where an input file is expected, means "use stdin"), so it is not possible to use echo 'from mymodule import *' | bpython -p - or bpython -p - <<<'from mymodule import *', but maybe stdin cannot be used like that if we want an interactive session.