Skip to content

RefreshMixin.refresh() doesn't remove removed attributes #1155

Closed

Description

@ericfrederich

Description of the problem, including code/CLI snippet

When attributes disappear from an object on the server RefreshMixin.refresh() doesn't remove them.

For instance if a job that has artifacts will have an artifacts_file attribute. If you call .delete_artifacts() on it, then call .refresh() the artifacts_file attribute will still be there.

# get a job with artifacts
job = project.jobs.get(job_id)
# will succeed
assert hasattr(job, "artifacts_file")
# now delete the artifacts from the server
job.delete_artifacts()

# This will fail because the artifacts_file is still there; refresh() didn't remove it
job.refresh()
assert not hasattr(job, "artifacts_file")

# If you get the job again from the project it'll be fine
job = project.jobs.get(job_id)
assert not hasattr(job, "artifacts_file")

Expected Behavior

I would expect that the attributes dict on any object should be exactly the same between a freshly retrieved object and an old object after calling .refresh()

o.refresh()
# After a refresh this should always be true
o.attributes == o.manager.get(o.id).attributes

Actual Behavior

They're not equal

Specifications

  • python-gitlab version: v2.4.0
  • API version you are using (v3/v4): v4
  • Gitlab server version (or gitlab.com): 13.2.3

Activity

  1. ericfrederich commented on Aug 20, 2020

    @ericfrederich
    ContributorAuthor

    Before creating a merge request I'd like to know if we feel this is indeed a bug.

    Doing a git grep "\._update_attrs(" "*.py" I see that this method is only ever called with server_data as the parameter.
    I'd suspect that we could simply modify the _update_attrs method to make it exactly equal.
    I'm guessing this because it is only ever called with server_data so likely never called with any partial updates.

    Current implementation

        def _update_attrs(self, new_attrs):
            self.__dict__["_updated_attrs"] = {}
            self.__dict__["_attrs"].update(new_attrs)

    The .update(new_attrs) could be replaced with = new_attrs.

  2. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Oct 12, 2020
    090a535
    e1e0d8c
  3. max-wittig commented on Oct 12, 2020

    @max-wittig
    Member

    This totally makes sense. There is no need to keep the old state

    I created #1213 and added a test for it

  4. locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators on Nov 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions