Skip to content

Project revamp #1190

Open
Open

Description

@diraol

Hey folks, after a long winter I'm back (although with very limited availability) trying to keep this project alive.

I've already built a testing environment base on Docker to help us move faster when testing and trying to work on the project.
But there is still a lot to be done.

Some of our dependencies (such as pylama) has been a long time without updates, and this is having its priced (lack of support, depending on deprecated stuff, etc).

So I'd like to know from the community which would be the best approach. Trying to vendor more packages to keep this project "minimally stable" or removing some of these old dependencies in favor of newer tools.

More specifically, should we try to replace most of the tools with ruff and mypy ? Do you think we would need other tools other than these two to have a quite complete setup?

Also, and this is very important. I will need help to do these migrations. As I've said, my availability is very restricted nowadays.

Or are you using new vim plugins that can easily replace this one?
As I haven´t been writing too much python code recently, I admit I'm bit outdated on the "vim+python ecossystem news".

Activity

  1. robtaylor commented on Jul 12, 2025

    @robtaylor

    I'd go with ruff and pyright at the moment, though pyrefly is starting to look good (I feel it currently lacks enough configurability and a bit of functionality to use on general codebases)

  2. robtaylor commented on Jul 12, 2025

    @robtaylor

    I'm really just using vim-lsp and vim-lsp-settings now. Python-mode could probably be rewritten as a small configuration wrapper on top of these?

  3. sc68cal commented on Jul 15, 2025

    @sc68cal
    Contributor

    I use YouCompleteMe for Python completion and suggestions, but I really really like python-mode for the increased syntax highlighting, linting, and syntax checking.

    I think moving towards using ruff would be great (I suppose with the new LSP feature) since that would probably help reduce the maintenance of python-mode.

  4. diraol commented on Nov 17, 2025

    @diraol
    ContributorAuthor

    Hey folks, I've proposed a refactor of the project using ruff. Would you mind trying it to check both performance and integration of ruff with python-mode?
    I haven't been writing much python-code, so it is going a bit harder for me to be able to properly test it.

    It's here.

    ps.: For now I've left Ruff out of the project source, so it needs to be installed manually on the system.

  5. sc68cal commented on Nov 17, 2025

    @sc68cal
    Contributor

    I will test starting in December as a daily driver, then provide feedback

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions