Jump to content

User:Michig/dash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requestsEntries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages0
Wikipedians looking for help0
Requests for unblock100
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests46
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests141
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests21
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests8
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests1324
Requested RD1 redactions1
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations0
Candidates for speedy deletion36
Open sockpuppet investigations61
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]


Reports

[edit]


User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletionEntries
Attack pages0
Copyright violations0
Hoaxes0
Vandalism0
User requested5
Empty articles0
Nonsense pages0
Spam pages4
LLM pages0
Importance or significance not asserted3
Possibly contested candidates8
Other candidates24
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 22 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 240 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attempt to convert this redirect into a new article. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads 07:15, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Incl. underlying IP. Favonian (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: A page highly susceptible to vandalism due to the highly contentious issue of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland. Szturnek¿odp? 08:33, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: A page highly susceptible to vandalism due to the highly contentious issue of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland. Szturnek¿odp? 08:34, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Someone keeps adding information for a non-existant Year 3 when the game ceased development after Year 2. Visokor (talk) 08:36, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent edit warring by IPs HaileyChoi9 (talk) 09:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Can I please have my talk page protected for a week or two because I have seen an influx of Vandalism from my page Strongshorts (talk) 09:36, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Danners430 tweaks made 10:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: The socks are back after the previous protection expired. Probably we need extended confirmed protection. Ymblanter (talk) 11:29, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – As per WP:ECRCASTE (WP:CT/CASTE). Ekdalian (talk) 12:04, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the last few days, multiple temporary accounts have conducted vandalism on this page. GrinningIodize (you just lost the game) (talk) 12:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Like many aircraft fleet articles this one attracts its fair share of unsourced additions/changes. See all the TA's related to the latest editor ~2026-58033-59 (talk · contribs). Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:14, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring, attempts of vandalism, additions of unreliable and conflicting sources that have been debunked. ~2026-57970-57 (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive editing to remove the basic genre for stop motion films, Failing AGF and using accusations at other editors in edit summaries. Halbared (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

See talk page: Talk:Shaun the Sheep: The Beast of Mossy Bottom#Stable version
This is part of a longer running conflict, where Halbared alleges a consensus and reverts every edit which removes "stop motion" from the first sentence of the lead without arguments: Talk:Wildwood (film)#"Stop motion" in lead
I am close on considering ths DND behavior. ~2026-42943-14 (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has constantly seen disruptive edits from IP editors, who typically change his year of birth to 1976. Several temporary protections have not stopped this. Roast (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: vandalism and edit wars ~2026-57741-53 (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive edits made by multiple accounts to manipulate the content. Much of its well cited sources are removed by the multiple accounts in coordinated manner. Hence requesting to add protection of highest level possible. Adrikshit (talk) 15:17, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Request for temporary semi-protection of Pixxel

I am a disclosed representative of Pixxel and have opened a conflict-of-interest edit request on Talk concerning disputed descriptions of the company's nationality and corporate structure.

The article experienced multiple edits and reversions on October 30-31, 2026, involving its lead, legal-entity characterization, headquarters and corporate-structure statements.

Examples from the history include:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pixxel&oldid=1383006295

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pixxel&oldid=1383022851

Complete history: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pixxel&action=history The issue concerns potentially misleading or insufficiently supported claims about a real company's identity and legal structure.

I request temporary semi-protection, if administrators find that the editing pattern meets the protection criteria, to prevent further disruption while uninvolved editors assess the sourcing and establish consensus.

This is not a request to enforce the company's preferred version of the article but protection against active vandalism by parties that have something to gain by mischaracterising Pixxel as an American company despite ample public proof of it being otherwise. Spacecowboy742 (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: High level of BLP violations and repetitive addition of facts from unreliable sources. May suggest pending changes protection. EvanTech10 (talk, contribs) ⚡ 16:58, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Page was just unprotected a few days ago and vandalism is already occurring again NRP (talk) 17:49, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Page sources & more than half the content have been removed by a user who is after removing the sources requesting the page to be deleted due to "lack of sources/recognition" in an attempt to mislead reviewers. Please see the page history, I have attempted to revert the changes but the user again deleted half the page and claimed I have a COI even though I am not the page maintainer nor the creator, the page has been on wikipedia since 2011, I suspect the user doing these changes are due to religious discrimination in Pakistan against members of the Ahmadiyya community. FestusBashara (talk) 18:18, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Consistent vandalism by TA sock. Multiple TAs have vandalised this page over the past few months, making seemingly the same edits every time, thus making me believe that it is one person vandalising the ability of creating TAs here on Wikipedia. They are solely here to vandalise Wikipedia. ThatNorthLondoner (talk) 19:38, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) In solidarity 20:02, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:32, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:32, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Reason: Protection is no longer necessary as despite the books popularity, the authors page is barely changed and is not known to many people, and does not suffer from persistent vandalism. Most people can access information about him through his own website, thus, why I'm voting to remove semi-protection. 55618sh (talk) 18:56, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Once again, "the protection is working" is not a reason to remove protection. Also, Wikipedia is not a democracy, we don't vote on things. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 19:12, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit be made to a protected page


The Houthis are currently listed twice, both as "Yemen (Supreme Political Council)" and as one of the constituents of the "Axis Of Resistance." Either "Yemen (Supreme Political Council)" or "Houthis" under "Axis Of Resistance" should be removed (preferably the former since the SPC has remained unrecognized internationally).

An alternative would be for "Yemen (Supreme Political Council)" under "Axis Of Resistance" and for "Houthis" to be listed under "Yemen (Supreme Political Council)." ~2026-51187-32 (talk) 01:19, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

Congress has not even declared war. Nobody is at war. How can you even have an entire webpage using a term about an event that is totally inaccurate? Stop watering down terms and sensationalizing media terminology. Nobody is at war. It should be changed to conflict or something more suitable, but only Congress can declare war and that has never happened. ~2026-58034-72 (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

16 protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Message box/ambox.css (request) 2026-09-23 03:53 Cascade-protected from Main Page (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
Module:Sister project logo (request) 2026-09-24 05:11 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Autoblockedtext (request) 2026-09-29 19:49 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Autoblockedtext-tempuser (request) 2026-09-29 19:49 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Blockedtext (request) 2026-09-29 19:49 MediaWiki page (log) Protected by Ixfd64 on 2005-09-22: "ok test worked"
MediaWiki:Blockedtext-composite (request) 2026-09-29 19:49 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Blockedtext-partial (request) 2026-09-29 19:49 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Blockedtext-tempuser (request) 2026-09-29 19:49 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Blocked text (request) 2026-09-29 19:49 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
Template:No article text/sister projects/styles.css (request) 2026-10-06 23:44 Fully protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2022-04-02: "match parent"
Template:No article text/sister projects (request) 2026-10-07 00:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Wikipedia languages/styles.css (request) 2026-10-09 05:56 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Flat list (request) 2026-10-14 15:17 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Picture of the day/On the main pages (log) Protected by Anomie on 2019-07-11: "Cascade-protecting to mirror Main page cascade protection to cover all options of multiple-picture POTDs, per discussion at WT:POTD#Use of Module:Random may be problematic"
Template:Collapse top (request) 2026-10-18 15:32 Fully protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk template or module; used in system message"
Module:Message box/tmbox.css (request) 2026-10-20 04:00 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Module:Template parameter value (request) 2026-10-26 14:25 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:22, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
21 template-protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Election box candidate with party link (request) 2026-07-26 10:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2026-08-12 15:05 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Module:Color contrast (request) 2026-08-21 17:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by Zzuuzz on 2016-10-26: "High risk module 235k+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox spaceflight (request) 2026-08-30 04:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:College (request) 2026-09-07 11:14 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Infobox election (request) 2026-09-07 20:53 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2025-07-01: "High-risk template or module: 8960 transclusions (more info)"
Module:PageLinks (request) 2026-09-15 05:06 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-03-30: "High-risk Lua module: 34,000 transclusions"
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/master.css (request) 2026-09-15 22:37 Template-protected (log) Protected by JPxG on 2023-12-05: "High-risk template or module"
Template:Infobox football biography (request) 2026-09-23 18:48 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mike V on 2014-03-01: "Highly visible page: restoring protection"
Template:Infobox rail line (request) 2026-09-30 12:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2026-10-03 12:24 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2026-10-07 22:01 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Infobox military installation (request) 2026-10-11 21:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Nominated (request) 2026-10-15 18:55 Template-protected (log) From Template:Nom: Modified by WJBscribe on 2015-08-24: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Infobox government agency (request) 2026-10-22 08:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Canadian party colour (request) 2026-10-23 21:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MSGJ on 2018-03-24: "reinstate template protection"
Module:Gridiron color/data (request) 2026-10-24 01:39 Template-protected (log) Protected by CambridgeBayWeather on 2018-06-22: "Highly visible template"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2026-10-27 10:55 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Infobox AFL biography (request) 2026-10-28 23:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Samsara on 2017-01-14: "Highly visible template: via RfPP (almost 13k transclusions now)"
Module:Year in various calendars (request) 2026-10-29 23:15 Template-protected (log) Modified by JJMC89 on 2019-02-25: "Highly visible module: match template"
Template:Infobox Israel village (request) 2026-10-31 19:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by Number 57 on 2022-01-08: "Editors shouldn't experiment with changes in widely used infoboxes. Use the sandbox first please"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:18, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

I have been editing since May last year and have created more than 25 articles. Two of them are rated B‑class, and most of the others are C‑class or Start‑class. Two of my articles, Presley Gerber and Killing of Sonia Exelby, were nominated for deletion because of differing views on their notability, but both were kept. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsShandog (talk • contribs) 11:59, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

Hi @ItsShandog, could you explain how you created Brendan MegrawBrendan Megraw in Diff/1290863082? Why did you use the {{navbox}} template in Diff/1290872406 and how did you produce that in such a short amount of time? Why did you remove the {{ai-generated}} tag (added in Diff/1348062842), along with utm_source=chatgpt.com parameters, in Diff/1348070103 and then restore the original redirect in Diff/1379884757 a couple of months later? ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:59, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
That would have been around the time I was new to Wikipedia from what I can recall, and looking at it now, it was days after I joined when I would have used ChatGPT. That was before I knew much about AI or about Wikipedia. I stopped using it a long time ago, as I saw how unreliable it was even before the ban on Wikipedia. I cannot explain the navbox, as I have no idea what that is. I would assume it was something to do with ChatGPT at that time. In regard to restoring it to a redirect, that was more to do with the fact that I was editing the disappeared page that covers all those people, and the page more or less repeats the same thing. It does not have any more information than the disappeared page. It was not anything to do with my old edits, as I did not even notice the ChatGPT bit on it. I forgot about that edit, as it was over a year ago. If I had remembered, I would have gone back and fixed all of that, but it is better as a redirect anyway. ItsShandog (talk) 15:17, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
The reason for the removal of the AI part was that this was at the point when I did not use it anymore, but I had not fixed the page at that stage, so I should not have removed it. That was my own fault. There were so many pages I would have edited when I was new that I could not remember them all, but any I come across now I try to fix. I probably removed the ChatGPT part because I would have assumed that was what the template was referring to. That would have been me trying to fix the page, but to be honest I did not know the ins and outs of AI until recently, or all the different ways it is incorrect. Even back in April I just assumed a page was tagged with that because it had old links from ChatGPT and that type of thing. It is only when I have started to read the AI signs page on Wikipedia that I have learned about all the different things it does. If I had known that in April, I would have done a lot of copyediting and fixing of that page. ItsShandog (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

I've been fully editing Wikipedia since May of this year, and I've created almost 50 active articles. I have had a couple deleted in my early days and, in recent times, have had about one nominated for deletion, but it was kept without hassle. Thanks! ReelCosmix (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. My previous request was declined due to a copyright-related concern. I acknowledge the feedback and remain committed to complying with Wikipedia's copyright policy and content guidelines.

I request a reassessment of my article-creation record and subsequent contributions. Thanks Biplab Anand (Talk) 01:42, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]

I want to use AutoWikiBrowser to speed up my deorphaning process as well as for general maintenance tasks. Script7921 (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights for Janes citation issue. Issue description: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Janes_citation_zotero_issue 3vw5 (talk) 11:43, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

@3vw5, is this the only task you want to use AutoWikiBrowser for? If so, you should ask at Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2026 (UTC)
Currently yes. Janes is a well known source for military articles. The issue will be recurring. I am even fine with a temporary permission 3vw5 (talk) 07:05, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I'd like to access the autowikibrowser to use the find and replace tool to change the constituencies for Welsh places with the infobox field constituency_welsh_assembly, as there are certainly hundreds of places in Wales with the old constituencies in their infoboxes. Otherwise, if there's a more appropriate tool for that kind of thing I'd like to know. Mr Cadno (talk) 18:43, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

[edit]

10 edits and counting and has been over four days since first KarkatOnMyCaptor (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

 Not done It has not yet been four days since your first edit. Your first edit was on the 28th at 00:43, four days from then would be 00:43 on the 1st - in approximately 6 hours time. stwalkerster (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Requests for event coordinator

Event coordinator

[edit]

Event organizer and board member of meta:Wikimedians of Chicago User Group, needs to be able to grant confirmed and manage CampaignEvents. We have one event currently active. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 18:59, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating, Dan! I'm happy to grant if Myoglobin could just confirm that he needs the permission here. —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 21:26, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Yes, thank you!! Myoglobin (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
 Done —⁠TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

Been doing RCP for a while now, would like to try helping out with this backlog :3 Although I don't have much experience at AfD, I like to think I can detect egregious cases, or inform the creator with maintenance tags and things otherwise. pattersonuwu njz (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguill talk 14:16, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

Requesting renewal of my right as my trial has ended. I haven't had the opportunity to review as many pages as I would have liked to, but am definitely still interested in helping with new pages and still believe I can be helpful in it. Red0ctober22 (talk) 01:27, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Let's do another trial run given the small amount of articles you were able to review. Done for another month.  Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:18, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

I would like to request permanent New Page Reviewer access. My current access expires on 18 November 2026. Thank you for considering my request. AriuCH (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 18 November 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
 Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to have a trial run. I've been editing for quite a while across different subject areas. Thanks! Giovanni Guasconti (a word with me) 14:45, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 218 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:50, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Looks like you still fall short of the prerequisites of 500 mainspace edits. I would consider overlooking that if you had a strong AFD or article creation record, but you don't seem to have done any work in those areas yet.  Not done for now, but feel free to reapply once you have more experience. signed, Rosguill talk 14:20, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
 Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:25, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights:Hello. I would like my rights renewed, as it is currently about to expire. I have participated in AFC mostly, and I am pretty active of AI notice boards, I'm also an AFC reviewer Emmanbotan🌹 (talk) 21:54, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 6 November 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 22:00, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
RC & abuse filter patroller and occasional huggle user, (read-only, manual actions via webpage). While mostly patrolling for G11, autobiography and UPE stuff, sometimes I see articles that are quite good. That and I see we have an infinitely long NPP backlog and I've got the time to waste, so. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads 11:32, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover

[edit]
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I have well understood WP:PCR and I pass WP:PCCRITERIA. I shouldn't claim that I am something special, so I rest my request for granting Admin. Whatever is decided, I would accept with good faith. Dylan Reed (Ping me) 08:12, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

@ppre Dylan Reed (Ping me) 10:06, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Normally, I would have summarily granted PCR, but this edit makes me pause. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Actually, upon further review, you are also broadly topic-banned.  Not done for now. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Accepted with good faith. Can I askyou a thing? Does TBAN prohibit rights? Dylan Reed (Ping me) 01:23, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
No. However, the topic ban was less than a month before this application, and your behavior there makes me question your judgment regarding Wikipedia's core content policies regarding notability, reliable sourcing, and verifiability. Reviewer is, at the end of the day, a content userright. Additionally, this request sat open for two weeks without any other admin being willing to grant it, while other requests were being granted. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:49, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I’m applying for the WP:PCR user right because I want whatever backlog it has by the time one reads it as low as possible. I have also read all mentioned policies in the section on prerequisites. TheEpicEgg56 04:33, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I am requesting to see if I am ready to help wikipedia a lot more, I am respecting your decision. Thank you CharlieRidesRollerCoasters (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I would like to request the pending changes reviewer permission. I'm familiar with WP:PCR, Wikipedia:Vandalism, WP:VANDTYPES/WP:VANDNOT, and content policies. I have 2,023 edits. I'm active in recent changes, patrol, AfD, and writing.

I will use this permission to help clear the pending changes backlog, and further my anti-vandalism efforts.

Thank you. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 16:06, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

I would like rollback to handle obvious vandalism more efficiently. I enjoy monitoring for spam, unconstructive edits, and talking to/notifying newer editors . I have read WP:ROLLBACK and will not use the default rollback summary on good-faith or disputed edits. Thanks. DocLG (talk) 22:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

 Not done. User has not edited in a month. Please re-request if you return to Wikipedia. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:13, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to have rollback permissions so I can utilize tools like AntiVandal to help out with recent changes patrol. Justcgi (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 182 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 15:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
Probably understated by alott Justcgi (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I would like to have rollback permissions to use Interceptor while out and about :) TobyKohlhagen (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 188 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 08:20, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
this probably would've increased past 200 by now TobyKohlhagen (talk) 06:16, 22 October 2026 (UTC)
 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

My reason for requesting rollback permissions is so I can make Recent Changes Patrolling easier with tools like Huggle and Interceptor instead of patrolling the old-school way. Evercool1 (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:13, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I would like to have rollback rights so I can use Interceptor in order to do RCP on mobile. FYI, I've already been granted Pending changes reviewer. —Leaf.Sheap ⇖ /.°°.\ ⇗ (They•Them) 16:21, 12 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights I would like to request rollback rights be better handle repeated vandalism incidents in Wikipedia articles. It will be beneficial and helpful for me to use such as Interceptor and Antivandal tools. Thank you. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 05:14, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:10, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I have been editing Wikipedia for a few years now. I do some of my work on articles related to WikiProject Schools. I believe rollback right might be helpful in reverting obvious vandalism. There is often a lot going on when it comes to schools. I am not particularly technically savvy and have done most of my editing by doing everything manually. It may take me a while to learn this tool, as it did take me forever to finally start using Twinkie. So I do hope that this tool might help me work more efficiently. Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:17, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

100k edits with eight years of experience in editing here. The reason for requesting rollback permissions is the need of cleaning up professional wrestling-related articles which I am constantly patrolling and keeping updated and away of spam or unsourced edits on a daily basis. JeyReydar97 (talk) 11:33, 15 October 2026 (UTC)

 Not done I'm not seeing much experience with recent changes patrolling. If you're looking to clean up those articles your best bet is Twinkle (or just undoing) anyway; rollback is mostly useless for anything besides RCP. TonySt  01:52, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
I don't really agree with this decision. JeyReydar97 has 8 years of experience and more edits than either of us. Unless there's something I'm missing, he definitely understands when he can and cannot use rollback. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:07, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I would like to request rollback rights. I do a lot of recent changes patrolling, and I think the rollback function and the tools that require the right would prove very helpful to me while patrolling. A while ago, I requested the rights and then realized I did not have 200 mainspace edits, so I withdrew my request. However, I should now have over 200 edits in the mainspace, and would appreciate if I could be granted the right. Thanks! Bucket of Bubbles (talk) 23:44, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 01:40, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

I would be honored to be granted the powers of the legendary Rollback flag to further destroy the morale of the nefarious vandal empire in my exalted conquest. They shall no longer have any hope of escape once I lay my eyes upon them and their unexplained content removals. EditWarCriminal (talk) 17:59, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

EditWarCriminal, is this a serious request? Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:04, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I am very active, and I use Twinkle but i feel as if getting rollback rights would give me access to more better tools and could help me make more reverts more fast, I have over 400+ edits, Anyways thanks for your time. Cheers, 208𝑦𝒆𝑎𝒉ℎ (talk) 03:36, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

 Not done. I don't think you have quite enough experience just yet. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I have been patrolling recent changes for a while with RedWarn and I would like to get rollback permissions so I can use CVPI. T430s • [ Talk ] 13:55, 26 October 2026 (UTC) T430s • [ Talk ] 13:55, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I have reverted vandalism, BLP violations and unsourced changes, as well as being a pending changes reviewer for over a month, so I think rollback will be very useful for me. 🦅White-tailed eagleTalk to the eagleStalking eagle 14:06, 27 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I'm GrinningIodize, and I would like to apply for the role of rollbacker. I have over 2000 edits on the English Wikipedia, and I enjoy hunting down vandalism and reverting it, so I'm hoping to get access to the new Special:AbuseReview tool. What would you all think about adding me as a rollbacker? GrinningIodize (you just lost the game) (talk) 17:56, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

Have more than 200 mainspace eidts, no recent history of edit warring, have consistently notified editors using Twinkle's warning feature. Given that I have had a RC patrol userbox since April, it should be clear that I have more than a month's experience of such. Beta Beta Beta - talk 00:44, 29 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done MCE89 (talk) 07:40, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights I would like rollbacker to help out by using the AntiVandal tool, to help quickly revert bad faith changes. Bennett Li11 (Talk to Me) 01:56, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

@Bennett Li11: could you explain these recent reverts of yours? . Nikkimaria (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
@Nikkimaria,
Just wanted to get more involved in vandalism and stuff.
Cheers,
Bennett Li11 (Talk to Me) 02:52, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Do you believe those are reverts of vandalism? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:53, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
@Nikkimaria,
No. These were recommended ‘check’ changes.
Cheers,
Bennett Li11 (Talk to Me) 04:58, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
 Not done. A large number of your recent reverts are questionable. Please review WP:BITE and WP:NOTVAND. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:17, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I would like to have the rollback permission to speed up my recent changes patrolling with tools like Interceptor and AntiVandal. I've been patrolling for over two months now, I understand when rollback can and cannot be used, and I always leave an appropriate warning on the user's talk page after a revert. Thank you for considering my request! Kapicapybara (they/them) (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights I would like rollback rights to easily revert edits. Emmanbotan🌹 (talk) 05:00, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

I'd need to move articles from my userpage sandbox to main space. That leaves plenty of redirections waiting for sysop to delete. Rollback right may generally avoid such a situation. I have rollback right in zhwiki and had much more before I went through wiki-semi-retirements. Hope this helps your judgement. だ☆ぜ (Dasze) 20:28, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 134 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 20:30, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]

Hello. I am requesting that my temporary TE rights be made permanent. As a TE, my edits have mostly consistented in non-controversial dark mode fixes/improvements and fulfilling edit requests. If I see a change that I think may be controversial, I try to bring it up on the talk page to discuss. While I have made some mistakes in the past by pressing publish too soon, I make sure to try and slow down and preview/test my changes. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 03:36, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary template editor rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 2 November 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 03:40, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Pinging @Primefac as they previously granted me this right. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 01:48, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
 Done – SD0001 (talk) 06:26, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I am requesting TE rights due to frequently working with creating and sorting templates, mainly architecture and sports-related templates, and recently engaging into authority database extra ID recommendations. JeyReydar97 (talk) contribs 09:56, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 7)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~99.5k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~5k)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0)
Primefac (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
 Not done for lack of demonstrated need; the mini-edit war at Template:Grand Slam-Triple Crown Champions is a little concerning as well. Primefac (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Understood. I'll continue to improve then. However, regarding to that small edit contradiction, the template did not feature the link of the respective wrestler twice as the others claimed so I had to create a new subgroup to fix the problem and avoid alleged duplicates. Everything was solved in the end. JeyReydar97 (talk) 11:13, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
While I do recognise that everything got sorted, it took twice as many edits as necessary; you broke the template, someone pointed it out, and you basically told them to fix it (while re-breaking the template in the process). I wouldn't have failed your application because of this back-and-forth, but it is being mentioned as something to keep in mind going forward. Template editors make mistakes just like everyone else, but when that happens they're expected to correct the issue or revert until such time as the proposed change can be properly implemented. Primefac (talk) 11:30, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Requests for temporary account IP viewer

Temporary account IP viewer

[edit]

I've done a good deal of recent changes and anti-vandalism patrolling, and believe TAIV would help in that regard. I agree to use it in accordance with Foundation policy. radioactOlive(she/it)(talk) 07:41, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 10:17, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

I have decent experience in filing SPI reports against UPE sockfarms. I am also AfC reviewer. I want the right so that I can combat sockpuppetry and vandalism. I agree to use this right in accordance with the Foundation's guidelines. Zalaraz (talk) 11:59, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

 Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:37, 30 October 2026 (UTC)