Repository navigation
Make build_method_def a associated function - #9490
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Builder and caller updates crates/capi/src/methodobject.rs, crates/capi/src/descrobject.rs, crates/capi/src/modsupport.rs, crates/capi/src/object/pytype.rs |
build_method_def is now an inherent method on PyMethodDef. The descriptor, module, type, and C-method construction paths invoke it on the definition. Existing validation and calling-convention dispatch remain unchanged. |
Priority:
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Change: Refactor
Possibly related PRs
- RustPython/RustPython#9484: Adds
PyModule_AddFunctions, which callsbuild_method_def; this change updates that call to use the method onPyMethodDef.
Suggested reviewers: youknowone
Merge Risk: 
Minimal · up to 9ca21
-
The refactor preserves the described method-construction behavior. No merge-blocking risk is established; merge after normal checks pass.
Pre-merge checks: 
4 · 
1
-
Failed checks: 1 warning Passed checks: 4 passedFull details: Docstring Coverage
-
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 1 functions across 4 files.
Resolution
Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
-
Finishing Touches
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing Footnotes
|
Summary by CodeRabbit